New IRS “Safe Harbor” Guidelines for Ponzi Victims Filing Tax Theft Loss Deductions
While Benrie Madoff was jailed last week after pleading guilty to charges surrounding his $65 billion Ponzi scheme, the IRS is busy issuing new guidelines for filing tax theft loss deductions.
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Doug Shulman reached out to thousands of Ponzi victims to provide “safe harbor” procedures for taxpayers who sustained investment losses discovered to be criminally fraudulent.
In addition to simplifying and clarifying the filing process for those seeking refunds on taxes paid on “fictitious income,” the safe harbor provides relief for victims who complained they would have to wait years for liquidation and litigation to end before they could calculate the amount of their losses and get relief on their taxes.
The good news for Ponzi victims is that by using the safe harbor, they can declare a theft loss on 2008 tax returns (the year the fraud was discovered) for 95 percent of the amount they invested with Madoff. This is in addition to any “earnings” they left under his control, minus any withdrawals and amounts that have a reasonable prospect of recovery (including monies recovered through filing claims with the Securities Investor Protection Corp., which can be up to $500,000).
For victims suing an investment adviser, the safe harbor is reduced to 75 percent, while those not suing will be able to recover 95 percent. Either way, the full loss may be deducted when disputes are ultimately resolved.
And to complicate things just a little more, victims who are part of partnerships, or small businesses, will be able to go back 5 years to recover investments and phantom monies. Previously, it appeared victims could only go back three years. With this new ruling, a theft loss deduction that creates a net operating loss for the taxpayer can be carried back five years and forward 20 years to generate a refund of taxes paid in other taxable years.
Here’s a hypothetical scenario that might help illuminate the procedure (published on Time.com).
A Madoff victim with a balance of $1.5 million, but who withdrew $500,000 over the life of the account, would multiply the resulting $1 million by 95% (provided they are not suing Madoff) to yield their NOL, or a “net operating loss” of $950,000. The NOL would then be reduced further by whatever claims recovered from SIPC. If, for example, a victim were to receive from SIPC $200,000, that victim’s net operating loss would be $750,000, which would be the number used on tax returns to go back five years and forward 20 years from 2008 to recover monies against taxes paid.
**For more advice and information on investment fraud representation, visit the Tax Resolution Services web site for a free tax relief consultation or call 866-477-7762.
More Tax Help, IRS News and Tax Relief Tips:
- What Safe Harbor Really Means for Ponzi Victims – IRS Estimates it will Refund Fraud Victims $17 Billion, But Not Without a Fight
- Tax and Planning Implications for Madoff Ponzi Scheme Victims
- Hire a Good Number Cruncher: Save Money and Avoid IRS Problems
- Is there a Double Standard for Delinquent Taxpayers and Tax Cheats That Favors Powerful Individuals?
- Get the IRS Tax Benefits You’re Entitled to and Avoid Tax Penalties by Documenting Your Business Expenses
Tags: Bernie Madoff, doug shulman, fraud recovery, investment fraud, investment fraud recovery, investment fraud representation, investment loss deductions, IRS help, irs problems, IRS section 165, Michael Rozbruch, ponzi scheme, safe harbor, tax expert, tax help, tax relief, tax resolution, tax resolution expert, tax resolution services, tax returns, Tax Tips, theft loss deductions







March 20th, 2009 at 6:54 am
[...] the NEW IRC Section 165 Safe Harbor Rules the IRS estimates it will refund victims of the Bernard Madoff’s massive ponzi scheme around [...]
February 7th, 2010 at 2:28 pm
If the amount exceeds your income what form is used to roll it forward?
How is this done, I understand we use schedule A and then put the amount on 4684. But I don’t see how it is rolled forward?
October 13th, 2010 at 7:34 am
In reference to Mark’s question of February 7th, 2010 posted above, what is the answer?
For others, the regulations pertaining to Safe Harbor noted in IRC 2009-20 only applies to the year of discovery 2008 going forward, not for any fruadulent losees prior to 2008.